In These Times: California healthcare battle gets uglier
By Kari Lydersen
The battle between SEIU and the National Union of Healthcare Workers (NUHW) over organzing home health care workers in northern California got even uglier recently with charges filed alleging SEIU organizers intimidated and threatened workers and even told Latino workers they would be deported if they didn’t vote for SEIU in a June election between the two unions.
SEIU won the election to represent 10,000 home healthcare workers in Fresno, but NUHW is challenging the result in charges filed Nov. 6 with the California Public Employment Relations Board.
The charges cite a former SEIU organizer alleging he was pressured to change ballots from the June election between the two unions, and did change a ballot himself.
NUHW has also charged SEIU local organizers told Latino workers they would be deported if they didn’t vote for SEIU, and told workers their wages would be cut and they would lose their jobs or health insurance if they voted for NUHW. NUHW alleges SEIU organizers visited workers up to five times a day, banging aggressively on their doors, and otherwise intimidated and browbeat them.
An SEIU local official quoted in the Wall Street Journal called the charges untrue and “sour grapes.”
(See the charges here.)
The charges reference a speech by SEIU executive vice president Dave Regan at the Fresno fairgrounds on the eve of the election urging organizers to “drive a stake through their heart” and “bury them in the ground.”
The rift between NUHW and SEIU has been festering for several years since the precursor of the NUHW, an SEIU local called United Healthcare Workers West, was unhappy with a nursing home contract that limited workers’ rights in exchange for employers’ neutrality. (David Moberg explains the background in this January story in In These Times.) Thousands of workers then voted to decertify SEIU and join NUHW.
Home health care has also been a battlefield between SEIU and AFSCME in recent years. These divisions and battles come at a time unions can hardly afford negative publicity or diversion of resources, as Congress considers the Employee Free Choice Act.
Source: Working In These Times